Post-harvest losses, leading to substantial grain loss, stem from various factors such as insect infestation, mold growth, rodent damage, adverse weather conditions, and inadequate storage practices. This study investigates the storage structures employed by farmers in Zenzelma Kebele and identifies the primary causes of grain loss. Despite the persistence of traditional storage structures like "Gotera" and "Gota," there is a noticeable lack of adoption of improved storage methods. The research highlights insects and rodents as major contributors to grain loss, both in the field and during storage. Farmers mainly use chemical measures to combat these pests, including fumigation and pesticides like Malathion. Additionally, sun drying remains a widely used traditional method. The study's findings underscore the urgent need for integrated pest management (IPM) strategies and the development of cost-effective, environmentally sustainable solutions to reduce post-harvest losses. Understanding local farming practices is crucial for designing effective interventions that enhance food security and promote economic sustainability in maize production. By focusing on the specific conditions and practices in Zenzelma Kebele, this study provides valuable insights into the challenges and opportunities for improving grain storage and reducing losses. Tailored interventions, informed by local needs and practices, are essential to address these issues effectively. The adoption of improved storage techniques and IPM strategies can significantly reduce grain losses, thereby boosting food security and supporting the livelihoods of farmers. This research advocates for a holistic approach to pest management and storage practices, encouraging collaboration between researchers, policymakers, and farmers. By promoting sustainable agricultural practices and innovative storage solutions, we can work towards a more secure and prosperous future for maize producers in Zenzelma Kebele and beyond.
| Published in | Science, Technology & Public Policy (Volume 8, Issue 2) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.stpp.20240802.11 |
| Page(s) | 30-37 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Assessment, Storage Structure, Grain Loss, Control Methods, Mirab Gojam Zone
| [1] | Garcia, D. A., et al. (2020). Grain Storage Losses: Causes and Management Strategies. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 40 (6), 1-18. |
| [2] | Ngugi, H. K., et al. (2018). Evaluation of On-Farm Grain Storage Structures and Their Impacts on Grain Quality in Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Stored Products Research, 77, 34-45. |
| [3] | Navarro, S., et al. (2019). Understanding the Dynamics of Grain Storage Losses: A Review. Food Control, 101, 66-78. |
| [4] | Mbuge, D. O., et al. (2021). Integrated Pest Management Approaches for Grain Storage: A Review of Strategies and Implementation Challenges. Crop Protection, 142, 105464. |
| [5] | Pachauri, S., et al. (2017). Innovative Technologies for Grain Storage: A Review. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 70, 67-75. |
| [6] | ISTA 2005 International Rules for Seed Testing: International Seed Testing Association, Bassersdorf, Switzerland. Link: |
| [7] | Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA). 2013. Establishing the status of post-harvest losses and storage for major staple crops in eleven African countries (Phase I). AGRA: Nairobi, Kenya. |
| [8] | Fufa N, Zeleke T, Melese D, Daba T (2021) Assessing storage insect pests and post-harvest loss of maize in major producing areas of Ethiopia. J Agric Sc Food Technol 7(1): 193-198. |
| [9] | Abraham, T. (1997). The biology, significance, and control of the maize weevil, Sitophilus zeamais. In D. Pimentel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Pest Management (pp. 105-112). CRC Press. |
| [10] | Boxall, R. A. (2001). Post-harvest losses to insects - A world overview. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 48(1-4), 137-152. |
| [11] | FAO. (1994). Grain storage techniques: Evolution and trends in developing countries. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. |
| [12] | Grolleaud, M. (2002). Post-harvest losses: Discovering the full story. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. |
| [13] | Magan, N., & Aldred, D. (2007). Post-harvest control strategies: Minimizing mycotoxins in the food chain. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 119(1-2), 131-139. |
| [14] | Tefera, T. (2012). Post-harvest losses in African maize in the face of increasing food shortage. Food Security, 4, 267-277. |
| [15] | Hodges, R. J., & Farrell, G. (2004). Crop post-harvest: Science and technology, Volume 2: Durables. Blackwell Publishing. |
APA Style
Zone, M. G., Woreda, B. D. Z., Kebel, Z., Mamo, T. Y. (2024). Assessment of Storage Structure, Cause of Gran Loss, and Methods Used to Control Storage Losses. Science, Technology & Public Policy, 8(2), 30-37. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.stpp.20240802.11
ACS Style
Zone, M. G.; Woreda, B. D. Z.; Kebel, Z.; Mamo, T. Y. Assessment of Storage Structure, Cause of Gran Loss, and Methods Used to Control Storage Losses. Sci. Technol. Public Policy 2024, 8(2), 30-37. doi: 10.11648/j.stpp.20240802.11
AMA Style
Zone MG, Woreda BDZ, Kebel Z, Mamo TY. Assessment of Storage Structure, Cause of Gran Loss, and Methods Used to Control Storage Losses. Sci Technol Public Policy. 2024;8(2):30-37. doi: 10.11648/j.stpp.20240802.11
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.stpp.20240802.11,
author = {Mirab Gojam Zone and Bahir Dar Zuria Woreda and Zenzelma Kebel and Tsigehana Yewste Mamo},
title = {Assessment of Storage Structure, Cause of Gran Loss, and Methods Used to Control Storage Losses
},
journal = {Science, Technology & Public Policy},
volume = {8},
number = {2},
pages = {30-37},
doi = {10.11648/j.stpp.20240802.11},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.stpp.20240802.11},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.stpp.20240802.11},
abstract = {Post-harvest losses, leading to substantial grain loss, stem from various factors such as insect infestation, mold growth, rodent damage, adverse weather conditions, and inadequate storage practices. This study investigates the storage structures employed by farmers in Zenzelma Kebele and identifies the primary causes of grain loss. Despite the persistence of traditional storage structures like "Gotera" and "Gota," there is a noticeable lack of adoption of improved storage methods. The research highlights insects and rodents as major contributors to grain loss, both in the field and during storage. Farmers mainly use chemical measures to combat these pests, including fumigation and pesticides like Malathion. Additionally, sun drying remains a widely used traditional method. The study's findings underscore the urgent need for integrated pest management (IPM) strategies and the development of cost-effective, environmentally sustainable solutions to reduce post-harvest losses. Understanding local farming practices is crucial for designing effective interventions that enhance food security and promote economic sustainability in maize production. By focusing on the specific conditions and practices in Zenzelma Kebele, this study provides valuable insights into the challenges and opportunities for improving grain storage and reducing losses. Tailored interventions, informed by local needs and practices, are essential to address these issues effectively. The adoption of improved storage techniques and IPM strategies can significantly reduce grain losses, thereby boosting food security and supporting the livelihoods of farmers. This research advocates for a holistic approach to pest management and storage practices, encouraging collaboration between researchers, policymakers, and farmers. By promoting sustainable agricultural practices and innovative storage solutions, we can work towards a more secure and prosperous future for maize producers in Zenzelma Kebele and beyond.
},
year = {2024}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Assessment of Storage Structure, Cause of Gran Loss, and Methods Used to Control Storage Losses AU - Mirab Gojam Zone AU - Bahir Dar Zuria Woreda AU - Zenzelma Kebel AU - Tsigehana Yewste Mamo Y1 - 2024/08/30 PY - 2024 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.stpp.20240802.11 DO - 10.11648/j.stpp.20240802.11 T2 - Science, Technology & Public Policy JF - Science, Technology & Public Policy JO - Science, Technology & Public Policy SP - 30 EP - 37 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2640-4621 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.stpp.20240802.11 AB - Post-harvest losses, leading to substantial grain loss, stem from various factors such as insect infestation, mold growth, rodent damage, adverse weather conditions, and inadequate storage practices. This study investigates the storage structures employed by farmers in Zenzelma Kebele and identifies the primary causes of grain loss. Despite the persistence of traditional storage structures like "Gotera" and "Gota," there is a noticeable lack of adoption of improved storage methods. The research highlights insects and rodents as major contributors to grain loss, both in the field and during storage. Farmers mainly use chemical measures to combat these pests, including fumigation and pesticides like Malathion. Additionally, sun drying remains a widely used traditional method. The study's findings underscore the urgent need for integrated pest management (IPM) strategies and the development of cost-effective, environmentally sustainable solutions to reduce post-harvest losses. Understanding local farming practices is crucial for designing effective interventions that enhance food security and promote economic sustainability in maize production. By focusing on the specific conditions and practices in Zenzelma Kebele, this study provides valuable insights into the challenges and opportunities for improving grain storage and reducing losses. Tailored interventions, informed by local needs and practices, are essential to address these issues effectively. The adoption of improved storage techniques and IPM strategies can significantly reduce grain losses, thereby boosting food security and supporting the livelihoods of farmers. This research advocates for a holistic approach to pest management and storage practices, encouraging collaboration between researchers, policymakers, and farmers. By promoting sustainable agricultural practices and innovative storage solutions, we can work towards a more secure and prosperous future for maize producers in Zenzelma Kebele and beyond. VL - 8 IS - 2 ER -
Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Holeta Agricultural Research Center, Crop Protection Research Program, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
