| Peer-Reviewed

Regional Government Public Policy Implementation in Tourism Development

Received: 17 August 2020     Accepted: 5 September 2020     Published: 19 September 2020
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

This study aims to analyze the description and explanation of the Implementation of Policy No. 09/2014 on the Regional Tourism Development Master Plan (RIPPDA) in tourism development. In addition, it analyzes the strategy of supporting factors and inhibiting factors for policy implementation. The research method is qualitative description, while the determination of the research location in the Morotai Island Regency area is carried out purposively, with sources or informants including the Head of the Tourism Office, the Regent, the Regional Secretary, the Regional People's Consultative Council (DPRD), local tourism object actors in the in the environment of Morotai Island Regency as an authorized official or related to the problem. Methods of data collection using observation, in-depth interviews (depth interview), documentation. Meanwhile, the data analysis technique in this study uses an interactive perspective method, and the validity of the data can be tested, following the triangulation method, namely, data reduction, data display, data verification, simultaneously with the implementation of checking techniques for a number of certain criteria, and also some aspects used in implementation. policy 1) Aspect of policy implementation process, 2) Aspect of impact of policy implementation, 3) Aspect of policy strategy, factors affecting policy implementation. The results of the research on Policy Implementation show that it has not achieved its objectives optimally. This needs to be seen from several problems: 1) Standard targets, policy objectives have not been given an understanding of the interests of the policy, this is complementary so that they do not know; 2) Human Resources for Implementers; 3) Characteristics of the fragmentation implementing organization (SOP); 4) The weakness of communication and coordination; 5) The attitude of the policy makers "from the top down" (top bottomer) in choosing the implementation of policies that are self-interested is not based on RIPPDA; 6) The lack of support from the external social, economic and political environment. Suggestions for RIPPDA research need to be revised by the Regional Government of Morotai Island Regency and the Tourism Office in synergy, synchronization, coordination with good work networks, support from external parties so that the Regional Tourism Development Master Plan policy can achieve its goals, tourism can develop.

Published in Science, Technology & Public Policy (Volume 4, Issue 2)
DOI 10.11648/j.stpp.20200402.15
Page(s) 76-84
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Policy Implementation, Local Government, Tourism Development

References
[1] Agustina Pallewa. (2017). Policy Implication Minimum service standards. Untag's Dissertation.
[2] Budi Winarno, 2017. Public Policy: Revised Edition Theory and Process. Indonesian Public Administration Reform Foundation (YPAPI) & Lukman Offset, Media Presindo, Yokyakarta.
[3] Bambang Sunaryo. (2013. Tourism Destination Development Policy. Concept and Application in Indonesia. GAVA MEDIA, Yogyakarta.
[4] Burhan Bungin. (2015). Tourism Communication. Tourism Communication, Marketing and Brand Destinations. PREDANAMEDIA GROUP.
[5] Journal of Social Humanities, 2015. ISSN 2087-4928 Volume 6 Number 2, October 2015.
[6] Meleong, Lexy J. 2005. Qualitative Research Methods Bandung: Rosda.
[7] Nawawi Ismail. 2009. Public Policy. Analysis, Advocacy Strategy Theory and Practice, PMN. Surabaya.
[8] Pasolong Harbani. 2011. Public Administration Theory. Alfabeta. Bandung.
[9] Riant Nugroho. (2017). Public Policy. Public policy dynamics, Public policy analysis, Public policy political management, Public policy ethics, Public policy chemistry. Elex Media Komputindo. GRAMEDIA COMPASS.
[10] Rasyid, Ryaas, 2002. Regional Autonomy: Background and Its Front Mass in Syamsudi Haris (ed), Decentralization, Democracy, and Accountability, Jakarta: AIPI and Partnership.
[11] RIPPDA-JM, 2014 in Implementing the Integrated Human Settlements Sector Program Policy, Maluku Utra Province.
[12] Swarbrooke. J. (2003) Sustainable Torism Management London Methuen.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Ibnu Kanaha, Arif Darmawan, Rachmawati Novaria. (2020). Regional Government Public Policy Implementation in Tourism Development. Science, Technology & Public Policy, 4(2), 76-84. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.stpp.20200402.15

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Ibnu Kanaha; Arif Darmawan; Rachmawati Novaria. Regional Government Public Policy Implementation in Tourism Development. Sci. Technol. Public Policy 2020, 4(2), 76-84. doi: 10.11648/j.stpp.20200402.15

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Ibnu Kanaha, Arif Darmawan, Rachmawati Novaria. Regional Government Public Policy Implementation in Tourism Development. Sci Technol Public Policy. 2020;4(2):76-84. doi: 10.11648/j.stpp.20200402.15

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.stpp.20200402.15,
      author = {Ibnu Kanaha and Arif Darmawan and Rachmawati Novaria},
      title = {Regional Government Public Policy Implementation in Tourism Development},
      journal = {Science, Technology & Public Policy},
      volume = {4},
      number = {2},
      pages = {76-84},
      doi = {10.11648/j.stpp.20200402.15},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.stpp.20200402.15},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.stpp.20200402.15},
      abstract = {This study aims to analyze the description and explanation of the Implementation of Policy No. 09/2014 on the Regional Tourism Development Master Plan (RIPPDA) in tourism development. In addition, it analyzes the strategy of supporting factors and inhibiting factors for policy implementation. The research method is qualitative description, while the determination of the research location in the Morotai Island Regency area is carried out purposively, with sources or informants including the Head of the Tourism Office, the Regent, the Regional Secretary, the Regional People's Consultative Council (DPRD), local tourism object actors in the in the environment of Morotai Island Regency as an authorized official or related to the problem. Methods of data collection using observation, in-depth interviews (depth interview), documentation. Meanwhile, the data analysis technique in this study uses an interactive perspective method, and the validity of the data can be tested, following the triangulation method, namely, data reduction, data display, data verification, simultaneously with the implementation of checking techniques for a number of certain criteria, and also some aspects used in implementation. policy 1) Aspect of policy implementation process, 2) Aspect of impact of policy implementation, 3) Aspect of policy strategy, factors affecting policy implementation. The results of the research on Policy Implementation show that it has not achieved its objectives optimally. This needs to be seen from several problems: 1) Standard targets, policy objectives have not been given an understanding of the interests of the policy, this is complementary so that they do not know; 2) Human Resources for Implementers; 3) Characteristics of the fragmentation implementing organization (SOP); 4) The weakness of communication and coordination; 5) The attitude of the policy makers "from the top down" (top bottomer) in choosing the implementation of policies that are self-interested is not based on RIPPDA; 6) The lack of support from the external social, economic and political environment. Suggestions for RIPPDA research need to be revised by the Regional Government of Morotai Island Regency and the Tourism Office in synergy, synchronization, coordination with good work networks, support from external parties so that the Regional Tourism Development Master Plan policy can achieve its goals, tourism can develop.},
     year = {2020}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Regional Government Public Policy Implementation in Tourism Development
    AU  - Ibnu Kanaha
    AU  - Arif Darmawan
    AU  - Rachmawati Novaria
    Y1  - 2020/09/19
    PY  - 2020
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.stpp.20200402.15
    DO  - 10.11648/j.stpp.20200402.15
    T2  - Science, Technology & Public Policy
    JF  - Science, Technology & Public Policy
    JO  - Science, Technology & Public Policy
    SP  - 76
    EP  - 84
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2640-4621
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.stpp.20200402.15
    AB  - This study aims to analyze the description and explanation of the Implementation of Policy No. 09/2014 on the Regional Tourism Development Master Plan (RIPPDA) in tourism development. In addition, it analyzes the strategy of supporting factors and inhibiting factors for policy implementation. The research method is qualitative description, while the determination of the research location in the Morotai Island Regency area is carried out purposively, with sources or informants including the Head of the Tourism Office, the Regent, the Regional Secretary, the Regional People's Consultative Council (DPRD), local tourism object actors in the in the environment of Morotai Island Regency as an authorized official or related to the problem. Methods of data collection using observation, in-depth interviews (depth interview), documentation. Meanwhile, the data analysis technique in this study uses an interactive perspective method, and the validity of the data can be tested, following the triangulation method, namely, data reduction, data display, data verification, simultaneously with the implementation of checking techniques for a number of certain criteria, and also some aspects used in implementation. policy 1) Aspect of policy implementation process, 2) Aspect of impact of policy implementation, 3) Aspect of policy strategy, factors affecting policy implementation. The results of the research on Policy Implementation show that it has not achieved its objectives optimally. This needs to be seen from several problems: 1) Standard targets, policy objectives have not been given an understanding of the interests of the policy, this is complementary so that they do not know; 2) Human Resources for Implementers; 3) Characteristics of the fragmentation implementing organization (SOP); 4) The weakness of communication and coordination; 5) The attitude of the policy makers "from the top down" (top bottomer) in choosing the implementation of policies that are self-interested is not based on RIPPDA; 6) The lack of support from the external social, economic and political environment. Suggestions for RIPPDA research need to be revised by the Regional Government of Morotai Island Regency and the Tourism Office in synergy, synchronization, coordination with good work networks, support from external parties so that the Regional Tourism Development Master Plan policy can achieve its goals, tourism can develop.
    VL  - 4
    IS  - 2
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Doctoral Administration Study Program, 17 Agustus 1945 University of Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia

  • Doctoral Administration Study Program, 17 Agustus 1945 University of Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia

  • Doctoral Administration Study Program, 17 Agustus 1945 University of Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia

  • Sections